Mono G-Win?? Ghyrson vs Questing Beast | Round 2 | Block101 110523

Decklist

Deck & Commander Strategies

Questing Beast
An aggressive, tempo-oriented deck that uses Questing Beast’s combat prowess and haste to apply pressure quickly, disrupting opponents through damage and combat tricks.
Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph
A value-centric deck that aims to build board presence with resilient creatures and synergistic interactions, focusing on outlasting opponents and winning through incremental advantage.

Gameplay Insights

1
Questing Beast’s ability to ignore blockers and prevent damage redirection forced Ghyrson Starn to prioritize removal and board control early in the game.
2
Ghyrson Starn’s resilience and card advantage generation allowed it to stabilize and regain board presence after early setbacks.
3
Choosing when to commit to combat or hold back was critical, as overextending against Ghyrson Starn’s removal could quickly shift momentum.
4
The duel highlighted the importance of tempo management and threat assessment in a matchup between aggressive and value-based decks.

Notable Cards

Questing Beast
Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

Gameplay Summary

The Duel Commander match featured a clash between two distinctive decks led by Questing Beast and Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph.

The game unfolded with Questing Beast applying early pressure through aggressive combat and board control, leveraging its commander’s evasive and impactful abilities to chip away at life totals.

Meanwhile, Ghyrson Starn’s deck aimed to stabilize with powerful creatures and synergistic effects, focusing on board presence and incremental advantage.

Key turning points included decisive combat phases where Questing Beast’s ability to bypass blockers forced Ghyrson Starn to use removal and defensive tactics to survive.

However, Ghyrson Starn capitalized on its resilience and value generation to turn the tide in mid to late game, threatening to overwhelm Questing Beast with multiple threats and card advantage.

Ultimately, the game showcased the tension between aggressive, nimble threats and a more methodical, value-driven strategy.

Watch on YouTube