Malcome & Smasher vs Tinybones vs Niv mizzet visionary vs Kinnan cEDH Gameplay

Deck Strategies

• 

  Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator & Vial Smasher the Fierce

  Utilizes a Grixis package to generate infinite Mana, primarily using cards like Lion's Eye Diamond.

• 

  Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy

  Follows a top four list from a recent EU championship tournament, the exact strategy isn't clear from the transcript.

• 

  Tinybones, Bauble Burglar

  Focuses on a stealing mechanic which introduces randomness into the deck's strategy.

• 

  Niv-Mizzet, Visionary

  Runs a curiosity storm strategy with a focus on pingers and storming off with Niv-Mizzet.

Gameplay Insights

• 1

  The Malcolm & Vial Smasher player used a Grixis package and specific cards such as Lion's Eye Diamond to generate infinite Mana, indicating a potential combo strategy.

• 2

  The Tinybones player's strategy revolved around stealing opponents' cards, which introduced a level of randomness and unpredictability into their game plan.

• 3

  The Niv-Mizzet player aimed to storm off with Niv-Mizzet and multiple pingers, suggesting a potentially explosive win condition if uninterrupted.

• 4

  There was strategic use of counter cards like Mental Misstep and Vampiric Tutor to disrupt opponents' plans and gain advantage.

Notable Cards

• 

  Lion's Eye Diamond

• 

  Vampiric Tutor

• 

  Mental Misstep

• 

  Chrome Mox

• 

  Tinybones, Bauble Burglar

• 

  Niv-Mizzet, Visionary

Summary

The game kicked off with all players showcasing their respective commanders and discussing strategies. Malcolm, Vial Smasher, Kinnan, Tinybones, and Niv-Mizzet were the commanders in play, each with a unique strategy. The Malcolm & Vial Smasher player revealed a Grixis package post ban to generate infinite Mana with cards like Lion's Eye Diamond. The Kinnan player chose a top four list from a recent EU championship tournament. The Tinybones player mentioned the randomness of the deck due to the stealing mechanic and the Niv-Mizzet player revealed a curiosity storm strategy. The early game involved players setting up their board states and trying to counter each other's plays. This led to a highly interactive mid-game with players trying to disrupt each other's strategies while advancing their own. The game concluded with a dramatic finish, although the final winner and the exact winning strategy are not clear from the transcript.