FORCED TO DISCARD IS..... good? | Kroxa vs Beamtown | Round 3 | NHE 100823 | Duel Commander thumbnail Blurred backdrop thumbnail
Duel Commander PH profile icon

FORCED TO DISCARD IS..... good? | Kroxa vs Beamtown | Round 3 | NHE 100823 | Duel Commander

Duel Commander PH


Commanders featured in this Gameplay Reviewed & Verified

Deck & Commander Strategies

  • Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger

    Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger

    Utilizes forced discard and graveyard recursion to disrupt opponents while applying steady pressure through repeated escapes, aiming to reduce opponents’ hand size and life total.

  • The Beamtown Bullies

    The Beamtown Bullies

    Focuses on aggressive board presence and incremental damage with resilient creatures to overwhelm opponents, relying on tempo and board control to secure victory.

Gameplay Insights

  • 1

    Repeated escape of Kroxa was critical in maintaining hand disruption and applying pressure throughout the game.

  • 2

    The Beamtown deck’s resilience and ability to stabilize after initial discard phases helped prolong the game and create windows for counterattack.

  • 3

    Balancing aggression with resource management was key for both players, as overextension could lead to being punished by board wipes or disruptive spells.

  • 4

    Timing of discard spells to maximize disruption and minimize opponent’s recovery options proved to be a game-changing decision.

Notable Cards

  • Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger

    Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger

  • Thoughtseize

    Thoughtseize

  • Kolaghan's Command

    Kolaghan's Command

  • Lightning Bolt

    Lightning Bolt

Gameplay Summary

The duel featured a matchup between a Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger deck and The Beamtown Bullies deck in a Duel Commander format.

Kroxa's deck leveraged forced discard mechanics and graveyard recursion to apply early pressure and disrupt the opponent's hand, aiming to repeatedly cast Kroxa and drain the opponent's life total.

The Beamtown Bullies deck appeared to focus on a resilient, aggressive strategy that could capitalize on board presence and incremental damage to outpace Kroxa's disruption.

Key turning points included Kroxa successfully escaping multiple times to maintain board dominance and force continual discard from the opponent, which kept the Beamtown player on the back foot.

However, the Beamtown deck managed to stabilize with efficient blockers and damage output, creating a tense back-and-forth dynamic.

The game was decided by how well each player balanced aggression with card advantage and resource management, with Kroxa’s discard and recursion combo proving pivotal in controlling the tempo and ultimately securing the win.

Watch on YouTube