No Tundra Challenge #2: Ghyrson vs Elminster* | Round 2 | VA 011423 | Duel Commander-in-Focus thumbnail Blurred backdrop thumbnail
Duel Commander PH profile icon

No Tundra Challenge #2: Ghyrson vs Elminster* | Round 2 | VA 011423 | Duel Commander-in-Focus

Duel Commander PH ∙ ∙

Commanders featured in this Gameplay Reviewed & Verified

Elminster

Elminster

Elminster card Elminster videos from Duel Commander PH 
EDH.Wiki 
Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph card Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph videos from Duel Commander PH 
EDH.Wiki 

Decklist

Elminster Deck on Moxfield

Deck & Commander Strategies

  • Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

    Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

    Utilizes morph creatures and transformative effects to out-tempo opponents and build board presence through surprise and incremental value, aiming to finish with combat damage.

  • Elminster

    Elminster

    Focuses on card advantage, control spells, and value generation to stabilize the board, disrupt opponents' plans, and win through attrition and incremental resource superiority.

Gameplay Insights

  • 1

    The no-Tundra restriction significantly limited mana fixing, forcing players to carefully sequence plays and prioritize basic lands.

  • 2

    Ghyrson's strategy heavily relied on timing of morph reveals to maximize combat effectiveness and board impact.

  • 3

    Elminster's reliance on value and control required patience and careful resource management against aggressive tempo swings.

  • 4

    Managing transformation triggers and combat phases was pivotal to shifting momentum in Ghyrson's favor.

Notable Cards

  • Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

    Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph

Gameplay Summary

The match featured a duel between Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph and Elminster, with the unique restriction of no Tundra or dual lands allowed, emphasizing mono-colored or basic land strategies.

Ghyrson Starn's deck aimed to leverage its morph and transformation mechanics to apply pressure, while Elminster utilized value generation and control elements to stabilize the board.

The gameplay involved strategic plays around resource management and timing of reveals or transformations, with both players navigating a limited mana base impacting their options. Key turning points included Ghyrson managing to successfully transform creatures to swing the tempo in his favor, while Elminster attempted to respond with removal and card advantage tools.

The absence of dual lands forced both players to carefully sequence their plays, impacting the speed and consistency of their decks.

Ultimately, the game revolved around Ghyrson's ability to capitalize on board presence and transformation synergy to overcome Elminster's control and value engine.

Watch on YouTube